bokomslag Evaluation of Human Reliability Analysis Methods Against Good Practices
Samhälle & debatt

Evaluation of Human Reliability Analysis Methods Against Good Practices

Nrc Staff United States Nuclear Regulat

Pocket

599:-

Funktionen begränsas av dina webbläsarinställningar (t.ex. privat läge).

Uppskattad leveranstid 3-8 arbetsdagar

Fri frakt för medlemmar vid köp för minst 249:-

Andra format:

  • 282 sidor
  • 2012
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has developed guidance for performing or evaluating human reliability analyses (HRAs) to support risk-informed regulatory decision-making and, in particular, the implementation of Regulatory Guide 1.200, "An Approach for Determining the Technical Adequacy of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Results for Risk-Informed Activities," dated February 2004. The NRC's detailed HRA guidance was developed in two phases. The first phase focused on developing "Good Practices for Implementing Human Reliability Analysis," as documented in NUREG-1792, dated April 2005. The second phase, summarized in this report, evaluated the various HRA methods that are commonly used in regulatory applications in the United States, with a particular focus on the extent to which they provide guidance to satisfy the good practices. Since the good practices closely parallel the requirements of the Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) Standard (RA-S-2002) promulgated by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), the HRA methods are also evaluated against that standard by implication. Toward that end, this report includes observations regarding the respective strengths and limitations of the HRA methods, as well as summaries of the scope, underlying knowledge base, and sources of quantification data associated with each method.

  • Författare: Nrc Staff United States Nuclear Regulat
  • Format: Pocket/Paperback
  • ISBN: 9781286863565
  • Språk: Engelska
  • Antal sidor: 282
  • Utgivningsdatum: 2012-10-26
  • Förlag: Bibliogov