Mantavya

It is a fundamental fact that in order to get an experience of / in our two aspects i.e., intellectual and practical life, there are two dimensions available to us, the first is 'from the experience of others' which is often related to psychologically / imaginatively aspect and the second is The 'physical / functional' aspect in which the inclusion of oneself is mandatory where interpretation is necessary in both the options, however it is done before in one theme and after the actions in the second theme but who will determine which topics to consider? According to me you should make it certain because its bitter but the fact is - "In this life you have no one else other than yourself and everyone is unique, everything is there if you are there otherwise the continuation of life never get interrupted", here the subject belongs to you / our existence, which depends entirely on one's own willingness, belief, deliberation and lastly acceptance of how it should be like?

From the means of sense organs, the three monkeys of Gandhiji are popular for welfare of the society but if the subject is only related to the sense organs then where are the rest two monkeys and their significance related to the other two senses? However, the message given by them is that - "Do not look at bad, do not say bad and do not listen to bad", which is neither carried nor followed by anyone today, if any group is practicing the same then surely such community and the people there will be in a minimal count which is itself concise in their own values. At present the reality is different and opposite, perhaps from my 'Mantavya' you will get the dimensions of the other two senses, related messages and proper/valid topics of deliberation in your life.